compare and contrast Lockes metaphysical theory with the metaphysical theory of Leibniz.

Make it philosophical, use examples please! Topic: Please compare and contrast Lockes metaphysical theory with the metaphysical theory of Leibniz. Both are atomists, but they are very different kinds of atomists and neither of their atomisms is what you would learn about atomism in the Chemistry or Physics departments today. What is similar and what is different in their atomisms? How does each philosopher explain interactions among atoms? What are monads? What are monads like? How do monads produce the world we find ourselves in? How does Lockes atomism compare with Leibnizs? Which is the better overall theory? Why? Please use this Textbook: Modern Philosophy An Anthology of Primary Sources edited by Roger Ariew, Eric Watkins Websites you can use: https://faculty.fiu.edu/

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *