How will you evaluate your strategy success once implemented?

Evaluation and dissemination discussion forum
OVERVIEW Evaluation is done so one can determine if the changes were successful and need to be continued or no successful and should be revised or eliminated. Evaluation of the changes will be based upon what the changes were and how you determined what the problem was to begin with. That method of determination can probably be used to measure the changes after implementation. Dissemination can be done in many forms. As a nurse serious about making things better for patients or staff, you are obligated to share your successes and failures with others to improve things for all patients or staff. The type of dissemination should fit the audience you are addressing. DIRECTIONS: Post an INITIAL RESPONSE answering the following questions by 11:55p.m. Tuesday of Week 3: 1. How will you evaluate your strategy success once implemented? 2. How will you share your findings with others in your facility (or elsewhere)? Certainly your personal opinion may have value if you based your evaluation on your own ideas but be aware that most of your knowledge has other origins and must be cited / referenced. Most of your responses should show critical analysis of the topic and, and all discovered information must be supported by evidence from the scholarly literature. Your response must be typed (or copied and pasted) directly into the discussion thread. Your initial post to the DF must have at least 2 peer reviewed resources, cited and referenced, and be 250-300 words in length. References cannot be older than 5 years. Please double space between paragraphs but do NOT use double spacing or indented paragraphs throughout. The only APA format should be for citation of sources in-text and the reference list. No file can be uploaded. RESPOND to one (1) posting from your peers. The same criteria concerning a personal opinion from the above paragraph, applies here as well. Your postings in response to your peers should be concise but facilitate a lively dialogue on the topic being discussed and should also show critical analysis of this week’s topic. Do NOT simply repeat information from your initial posting.The secondary or peer response must be between 150-200 words with at least one peer-reviewed reference. Please double space between paragraphs but do NOT use double spacing or indentions throughout. The only APA format should be for citation of sources in-text and the reference list. No file can be uploaded. Evaluation & Dissemination Discussion Forum Rubric Proficient Outcome (15 to 20 Points) Competent Outcome (8 to 14 Points) Developing Outcome (1 to 7 Points) Maximum Possible Points on Each Post Earned Points on Primary Earned Points on Secondary Initiative Comments were adequately responsive to the discussion item posted. 1. Sufficiently describes the evaluation process for strategy success implementation. 2. Sufficiently describes how findings will be disseminated. Comments were partially responsive to the discussion item posted. 1. Partially describes the evaluation process for strategy success implementation. 2. Sufficiently describes how findings will be disseminated. Comments were minimally responsive to the discussion item posted. 1. Minimally describes the evaluation process for strategy success implementation. 2. Minimally describes how findings will be disseminated. 20 & none /20 N/A Contribution of New Ideas Contributed new information to the discussion by bringing in relevant ideas from outside course (prior knowledge). Shared new perspective or analysis of ideas. Substantive comments and questions that significantly helped to move the discussion forward. Provided a few examples of follow-up questions or examples to add new perspectives. Made comments or asked questions that helped to move the conversation forward. Minimal contribution of new information to the discussion. Minimal contribution to the discussion to help move the discussion forward. Showed minimal or no evidence of reading classmates postings. Did not respond to a peers posting. 20 & 20 /20 /20 Expression of Ideas; APA Style Elaborated on ideas of others including instructor and classmates by sharing additional examples and adding further explanation; Discussion was expressed in a clear and respectful manner; APA style adhered to; no spelling or grammar errors; is within word limits. Postings were constructive but lacking clarity; Posting done in a respectful manner; Moderate problems with APA style noted; minimal problems with spelling or grammar; exceeds word limits. Minimal follow-up on others ideas; Ideas expressed unclear; Posting was expressed in a respectful manner; Major problems with APA style evident; moderate problems with spelling or grammar; exceeds word limits. 20 & 20 /20 /20 60 & 40 Total Score The following program policy applies separately to the Primary and Secondary postings: 3. Written Assignments and Final Project: a. Are to be submitted by the due date and time. b. Students failing to meet the deadline will receive an automatic 50% reduction on their paper prior to actual grading. If the student fails to submit within the next 24 hours, a grade of 0 will be assigned c. It is the students responsibility to recognize their failure to submit and notify the instructor or teaching assistant within the 24 hour time frame. Contact should be made via email with the late assignment attached. (This is not for routine use. It is only for late assignments.)
Hide

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *