RTI- MTSS- and Special Education Identification Processes

Attachments

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
SPD-510 SPD-510-O500 RTI, MTSS, and Special Education Identification Processes 70.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Explanation and Visual of RTI, MTSS, and the Special Education Identification Process 40.0% Not addressed. Explanation is incomprehensible or wholly inaccurate. Brochure for parents is missing the required visual, or visual insufficiently or inaccurately outlines the special education identification process, RTI, and MTSS. Explanation describing the process and parental rights is lacking detail or missing key information. Brochure for parents includes an unclear or underdeveloped visual outlining the special education identification process, RTI, and MTSS. A sound explanation describing the special education identification process is provided. Brochure for parents includes a simple, accurate graphic organizer outlining the special education identification process, including RTI, and MTSS. Brochure for parents includes a visually appealing graphic organizer that accurately outlines the special education identification process, including RTI, and MTSS. An insightful explanation describing the special education process is provided.
Overview of Procedural Safeguards and Parental Rights 20.0% Not addressed. Overview insufficiently or inaccurately describes the procedural safeguards and parental rights. Overview describing the procedural safeguards and parental rights is lacking detail or missing key information. A sound overview of the procedural safeguards and parental rights is provided. An insightful overview of the procedural safeguards and parental rights is provided.
Resources to Support Families who have Children with Disabilities 20.0% Not addressed. Resources for families are inappropriate for context or missing. Includes less than three resources to support families or resources only loosely relate to the needs of families in this context. Includes appropriate resources to support families. Includes relevant, quality resources to support families.
Research 5.0% Not addressed. Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible. Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible. Research is relevant and generally supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. Research is supportive of the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment.
Overall Presentation 5.0% Not addressed. The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable to families. The work is not neat and includes several minor organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable to families The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be presentable to families The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly presentable to families
Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *